On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 06:25:39PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
> > This draft looks good.
> >
> > One nit, omitted "TLS" before SignatureAlgorithm in two places in
> > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-02.html#section-15-3
>
> Would it be appropriate to clarify the status of Ed25519 in DTLS?
>
> https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/2019-November/011582.html
>
> and if so, where should such clarification happen? The registry already
> marks Ed25519 as "DTLS-OK", but unclear on what basis...
See also:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/?gbt=1&index=7Mjmu7mANU5l5mcJQKd3BAY0_3A
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
