On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 02:44:18PM +0000, Kampanakis, Panos wrote: > ACK, thx all. So we should refrain from defining such “point-in-time” > codepoints for other needed long-term algorithm combinations to not > waste registry space. Only absolutely necessary codepoints should be > registered.
That registry has >64,000 free codepoints. I don't see there being anywhere close enough individual registrations to fill that up, no matter how loose the criteria are. However, with post-quantum, there is another reason to be careful: The shares are so large that the client effecively only has one shot. Some sort of systematic registrations reseving large chunks of space is the only way I can foresee the registry being seriously depleted. In contect of TLS groups, No such registrations exist currently, nor have I seen proposals for such thing. -Ilari _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
