On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:33:52AM -0500, Deirdre Connolly wrote:
> At the TLS meeting at IETF 118 there was significant support for the draft
> 'TLS 1.2 is in Feature Freeze' (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rsalz-tls-tls12-frozen/) This call
> is to confirm this on the list. Please indicate if you support the
> adoption of this draft and are willing to review and contribute text. If
> you do not support adoption of this draft please indicate why. This call
> will close on December 20, 2023.
I take no issue with the WG declining to do further non-emergency work
on TLS 1.2, if that promotes best use of scarce WG cycles.
I do however wonder why this requires a draft formalising the stance?
The simplest way to not do non-emergency work on TLS 1.2 seems to me to
not do non-emergency work on TLS 1.2. Is the draft actually necessary?
Would not working on the draft save even more cycles?
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
