Well, I didn’t write this to merely get things off my chest. Well, it sure reads that way. For example, calling it an “attack” is needlessly provocative. Saying that TLS provides sufficient privacy, when the ECH document itself points out that having the SNI in the clear is a privacy concern, shows a poor understanding. You seem to disagree with that concern, which is fine, but your argument in the document is not persuasive. Take this feedback however you want; it’s worth what you paid for it.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
