Paul: > The draft looks mostly okay. It should fix a few small issues: > > The document needs to Obsolete: 8773
Indeed. Fixed. > Please also mark this so in the datatracker, so reviews can more easily diff > 8773 against the latest 8773bis draft. I do not think this is something that I can do as document Author. Can the TLS WG chairs do it? > Add a note in the Abstract that this raises the Document Status from > Experimental RFC to Standards Track RFC I suggest: "This Standards Track RFC (once approved) obsoletes RFC 8773, which was an Experimental RFC." > The reference draft-hoffman-c2pq is oudated. Change this to > draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers. Updated the reference. > Update all references of RFC8446 to 8446bis (section 4.3.2 stayed the same, > but Appendix E.6 of [RFC8446] becomes Appendix F.6 of [RFC8446]) Fixed. > Once this is done, I will issue the IETF LC. Draft -09 was just posted. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-8773bis/ Russ
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
