If specification required means "get an RFC", why do we have it instead of standards action?
There are some folks who take that sentence in the I-D boilerplate with as much importance as other content in a draft. There are some who don’t. Sometimes there’s an external document. In this case, maybe pointing to the FIPS document suffices; I don’t know. I am also cognizant that “focus our attention on what is actually important for TLS” can be off-putting. As far as I know, this document came from a collection of long-time IETF contributors.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
