"Should an I-D-assigned codepoint be enough for folks or is the boilerplate too scary" is an interesting conversation to have, but I don't see how it is relevant to the adoption of this document, where the alternative is indeed to email i...@iana.org requesting TLS SignatureScheme codepoints with Recommended = N, Reference = FIPS 205, and Comment = For TLS 1.3 or later (per draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen).
The authors have decades of experience in the IETF and want the TLS WG to work on this doc. How is that not relevant? Is it going to get the full and focused attention of most of the WG members? Nope; this isn’t TLS 1.3. So why not?
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
