I support publishing this draft, with no opinion on the recommendation flag, other than a hope that we don't get distracted by it for too long.
Well, technically my opinion is that X25519MLKEM768 should be recommended, but I also think that neither this flag nor the MTI flag have any meaning in the first place, due to the lack of an RFC police, so I am entirely indifferent on the value it is given. On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:14 PM Kris Kwiatkowski <kris= [email protected]> wrote: > Dear Dan, > > Vulnerability scans show again and again that these > devices are normally out of date (and it's also well understood why) > > This point is particulary interesting. Can you provide a reference to > those vulnerability scans? > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- Sophie Schmieg | Information Security Engineer | ISE Crypto | [email protected]
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
