On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 1:13 PM Jan Schaumann <jschauma= [email protected]> wrote:
> "D. J. Bernstein" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > As for SecP256r1MLKEM768 and SecP384r1MLKEM1024 in this draft, the > > > > current status is that they're basically not supported in > > > > deployments at all. > > > acm.us-west-1.amazonaws.com (US), > > [ etc. ] > > > > I stand by what I said. The top-100000-sites survey from > > > > https://www.netmeister.org/blog/pqc-use-2025-03.html > > There have been some changes since March. My latest > results from September show 6,159 sites supporting > SecP256r1MLKEM768 (vs. 38,931 supporting > X25519MLKEM768). > > https://www.netmeister.org/blog/pqc-use-2025-09.html > > But at this point, it looks to me like it's basically > just AWS Cloudfront that supports SecP256r1MLKEM768 > (as reflected in the selection of services Panos > posted). > Note that the vast majority of the sample set (and hence the X25519MLKEM768 support) is Cloudflare, so to some extent we're seeing the decision by Amazon to support P-256 and Cloudflare not to. -Ekr > > -Jan > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
