> On 11 Oct 2025, at 19:53, D. J. Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> IESG's entire rationale for saying that my complaint wasn't "valid" is
> one sliver from your list of excuses: it boils down to the fact that at
> that point I wasn't using the IETF-approved text for opting out of
> IETF's copyright grab. This isn't my fault---it's not as if IETF warns
> participants about the copyright grab in the first place, never mind the
> buried opt-out text.
https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well/
and BCP 78 are cited by the chairs in their introductory slides to every
workgroup meeting, so that all participants are aware of the position on
copyright.
but you don't participate in the meetings, do you?
I think your continued comments would be more convincing if they were more
truthful.
And shorter. Much shorter.
Lloyd Wood
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
