On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 3:43 PM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 12:18 PM Muhammad Usama Sardar < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 26.01.26 21:07, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> I am also lost why this was mentioned as a charter discussion. In my >> reading of DANCE charter [0], your proposal is not at all prohibited. In >> fact, coordination with TLS WG was supposed to happen. In particular, >> charter says: >> >> > DANCE will define how DNS DANE records will represent client >> identities for TLS connections. >> >> > DANCE will coordinate with the TLS working group to define any TLS >> protocol updates required to support client authentication using DANE. >> > > It is indeed unfortunate that this latter item did not happen. > What protocol updates did DANCE define that required TLS WG support? Also see: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/wW712Ib3H66lBdVbzShPged4jcw/ where DANCE was mentioned to the TLS WG in a thread, and https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/__ygU4Hqd2II-NsbpSpAcpJBozI/ where you say TLSA/DANE (and thus DANCE) is out of scope for the TLS WG. Paul
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
