On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 04:05:11PM +0000, Kampanakis, Panos wrote:
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-tls-pqc-continuity/
The proposed "validity_period" component looks rather similar to what
was proposed for the DANE chain extension some years back, which
encountered fierce pushback from EKR and others and ultimately derailed
that RFC.
What's different this time? Why would it be OK for a server to commit
to ongoing support for PQC certs when it wasn't OK for it to commit to
ongoing support for DANE chains?
--
Viktor. 🇺🇦 Слава Україні!
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
