Please stop attacking the respectable members of the WG.
I haven't done any formal analysis for DANE or PQ. So I am neither interested in the history nor the details.
If your concern is about DANE, I want precise answer to two questions posted a couple of times since December 16 [0,1,2]:
Did you reach out to the researchers who did DANE-related formal analysis? What did they say?
The first one is pretty binary. Why are you not giving a yes/no answer to it?
Thanks for staying on point. -Usama [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/VfgJ5ExuYXvEiSGlNJ0X8L1jGHI/ [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dance/GIPVxwb4SnnN4I4K-xY0QLK0EzQ/ [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/c6ZR2fkfqZlGxGiKPmlA1dWo_uw/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
