Hi Thom,

On 17.03.26 10:06, Thom Wiggers wrote:
I wish we’d be mandating proper forward secrecy, but that’s a bit tough to 
truly mandate.
Could you explain a little why it is tough to mandate?
  (Though it should be noted that most _do_ currently assume actual ephemeral 
key exchange.)

Since you write "most", I was wondering if you are aware of any formal analysis that does not make this assumption. If possible, a pointer would be great. Thanks.

Best regards,

-Usama



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to