On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 01:54:13AM +0100, Muhammad Usama Sardar wrote: > On 19.03.26 01:41, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > What I'm denying (more precisely fairly sceptical about) is whether the > > change has any practical value. I don't see it making any difference, > > Not making a difference for OpenSSL != not making a difference for others. > > I thought OpenSSL is not /the only/ thing folks in WG care about. Maybe I am > wrong?
Nowhere in that (or other) replies did Viktor say anything like that it doesn't make a difference for OpenSSL therefore why bother. > > and if, hypothentically, in the future I would find a compelling case for > > keyshare reuse, I'd go ahead and reuse, the new text notwithstanding. > > I'd like to know such a compelling case. It would have to be performance related. Or perhaps a silly key escrow thing that no one here would support. > > The current SHOULD NOT text is quite sufficient to make it clear that > > almost always single use is better, and the client needs good reason > > to do otherwise, updating this to MUST does looks like a feel good > > exercise that does not in practice change anything. > > Ditto the statements above for OpenSSL. Which statements? Viktor made no such statements. Nico -- _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
