>It is not a privancy issue for server-to-server traffic, with servers running on fixed IP addresses, even, in say SMTP, sending their domain names in the clear prior to STARTTLS!
Agree. But this type of servers do not need to optimise 41 µs operations that happens once per connection. John From: Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> Date: Friday, 20 March 2026 at 14:46 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [TLS] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Prohibiting key share reuse On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 06:38:55AM +0000, John Mattsson wrote: > Andrei Popov wrote: > >I'm with Viktor on this one, however don't see a reason to object to a > >feel-goodchange. > > Very strange to call this a "feel-good change" as reuse of key shares very > clearly is a privacy issue. It is not a privancy issue for server-to-server traffic, with servers running on fixed IP addresses, even, in say SMTP, sending their domain names in the clear prior to STARTTLS! Some concerns are not universal. -- Viktor. 🇺🇦 Слава Україні! _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
