Thank you for the shorter security considerations. In my opinion, the revised
section is more clear.
I noticed two typos:
Section 4.2: s/[RFC8446]/[RFC8446bis]/
Section 5: s/{KOBEISSI26}/[KOBEISSI26]/
> On Jun 24, 2026, at 10:36 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-08.txt is now available. It is a work item
> of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) WG of the IETF.
>
> Title: ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3
> Author: Deirdre Connolly
> Name: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-08.txt
> Pages: 10
> Dates: 2026-06-24
>
> Abstract:
>
> This memo defines ML-KEM-512, ML-KEM-768, and ML-KEM-1024 as
> NamedGroups and and registers IANA values in the TLS Supported Groups
> registry for use in TLS 1.3 to achieve post-quantum (PQ) key
> establishment.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-08.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-08
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
