Forgot to say that the comparison btw pure PQ and hybrid is quite nice. It can be a good example for similar scenarios.
Last paragraph of 5. Security Considerations: “Implementers must evaluate their specific security, performance, and operational constraints when deciding whether to deploy standalone ML-KEM or a hybrid construction. The recommended column in the IANA TLS Supported Groups registry contains the IETF's current guidance on the recommended use of these algorithms for general purposes.” Thanks, Guilin From: Deirdre Connolly <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, 25 June 2026 1:33 am To: John Mattsson <[email protected]> Cc: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [TLS] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-08 (Ends 2026-07-08) Oh here is is (the rendered Editor's Copy): https://tlswg.org/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem.html On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 1:24 PM Deirdre Connolly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >There are three references to [RFC8446] that should be updated. [RFC8446] >should be removed from the reference section. Fixed > The info for [RFC8446bis] in the reference section is wrong. It is just copy > pasted from [RFC8446] Trying to do !RFC8446bis just picked up the old 8446 info, fixed > Some browsers do not let me access the URL as I have not installed the DoD > Root Certificate. When using Firefox, I get a CNSS.gov Error Message instead > of the document We weren't even using that ref anymore, removed, along with eight other now dead references > [DOWLING] > The URL should be https://doi.org/10.1007/s00145-021-09384-1 Fixed > [tlsiana] > This should point to RFC 9847 instead of draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis Fixed > OLD: John Mattsson > NEW: John Preuß Mattsson Fixed https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem/blob/main/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem.md?plain=1 The Editor's Copy job keeps saying it's running but it's not rendering these updates... On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 11:44 AM John Mattsson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: All my issues have been addressed. I support publication. Some Editorial comments: ---- Russ Housley wrote >Section 4.2: s/[RFC8446]/[RFC8446bis]/ There are three references to [RFC8446] that should be updated. [RFC8446] should be removed from the reference section. The info for [RFC8446bis] in the reference section is wrong. It is just copy pasted from [RFC8446] ---- [CNSSP15] Some browsers do not let me access the URL as I have not installed the DoD Root Certificate. When using Firefox, I get a CNSS.gov Error Message instead of the document. --- [DOWLING] The URL should be https://doi.org/10.1007/s00145-021-09384-1 --- [tlsiana] This should point to RFC 9847 instead of draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis --- OLD: John Mattsson NEW: John Preuß Mattsson (My emails are lying) --- Cheers, John Preuß Mattsson
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
