30+ years is “very new”? As for the experts - they appear to be divided. — Regards, Uri
> On Jun 30, 2026, at 05:53, Patrick Duc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside the Laboratory. > My bad, I made a typo. I meant "hybrid cryptography appears clearly more > secure". > At least, that's the opinion of experts. > The important fact to acknowlewdge is that pure PQC algorithms are very new. > Consequently, they may contain flaws that can be successfully attacked. > > Sorry for the typo. > > Patrick > > > Le lundi 29 juin 2026 à 17:20:55 UTC+2, Yaakov Stein <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > > * For the time being, hybrid cryptography appears clearly less secure than > > solo post-quantum cryptography > > I do not support the publication of this document. > > Less secure but should be used ? > > Y(J)S > This message is intended only for the designated recipient(s). It may contain > confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the designated > recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have > mistakenly received this message, please notify the sender by a reply e-mail > and delete this message. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
