My bad, it was a typo. I meant "hybrid cryptography appears clearly more secure
than solo post-quantum cryptography".
Patrick
Le lundi 29 juin 2026 à 17:54:10 UTC+2, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
<[email protected]> a écrit :
>> * For the time being, hybrid cryptography appears clearly less secure than
>> solo post-quantum cryptography
>> I do not support the publication of this document.
>
> Less secure but should be used ?
Hybrid will always be less secure, if (a) you agree that CRQC is coming, and
(b) your data will remain sensitive through that time.
Therefore, IMHO it should not be used — but unlike some others on this list, I
want those who have reasons to use Hybrid, to be able to do so, without having
to convince me that they truly really want/need it.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
