"Salz, Rich" <[email protected]> writes: > There is not WG consensus to recommend pure-PQ algorithms at this > time. I doubt further clarification is needed, and adding any words > runs the risk of restarting the flame wars that have enveloped the WG > on this issue.
I believe to the contrary, that if actual wordings about the risks with non-hybrids and lattices was inserted into document, and publishing this on the ISE track, the flame wars would stop. It seems reasonable that flame wars errupt when there is a push for a flawed document in a WG and proponents of the work do not accept suggestions how to mitigate even the most significant technical and process concerns. Please, consider withdrawing this document from the TLS WG and publish it on the ISE track as Informational with appropriate warnings instead. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
