>> There is not WG consensus to recommend pure-PQ algorithms at this >> time. I doubt further clarification is needed, and adding any words >> runs the risk of restarting the flame wars that have enveloped the WG >> on this issue. > > I believe to the contrary, that if actual wordings about the risks with > non-hybrids and lattices was inserted into document, and publishing this > on the ISE track, the flame wars would stop.
The flame war will not stop with such a concession, because the opponents of the draft took position of “I don’t need it — therefore you must not be able to use it.” > It seems reasonable that flame wars errupt when there is a push for a > flawed document in a WG and proponents of the work do not accept > suggestions how to mitigate even the most significant technical and > process concerns. The draft is not flawed. It’s all politics.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
