Well, since someone asked me to clarify: I do not support publication of this document by the TLS WG or the IETF.
But, I do support publication and a stable reference. Just like this one: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9189/> That route doesn't require a consensus call from the chairs. thanks, Rob On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 7:26 AM David McGrew (mcgrew) <mcgrew= [email protected]> wrote: > I support the publication of draft-ietf-tls-mlkem as an RFC. It deserves > a stable normative specification because there is a community of interest, > and it makes sense to document the straightforward non-hybrid approach. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
