[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes: > Sounds a lot like TMDA to me. :( Filing date is July 26, 2001, > granted May 16, 2002. > > TMDAers, have you seen this before?
No, but thanks for pointing it out. > I'd presume TMDA is prior art, but still, it could be troublesome... Yup. TMDA's core functionality was fully established before even the filing date. Anyone with experience in this area have a recommendation on whether this should be pursued or not? _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
