Is base64 not decoded for examination?

[Gil Gonzales]

TMDA/0.71 (Python 2.2.2 on linux-i686) From a tarball Running on Postfix Running TMDA from ~/.forward TMDA is great so far.  I have spam coming in with the html encoded base64 with no matching text/plain.  TMDA is not seeing the text in the message. For example with this filter: body tropicalpills\.com reject and this message that does contain tropicalpills.com:  (Personal info removed) Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.myisp.net (mail.myisp.net [10.0.0.1])  by mail.mycompany.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF95023C0ED  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  9 Mar 2003 13:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from pacific.net.in (adsl-64-171-184-2.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net  [64.171.184.2])  by mail.myisp.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h29Lbcf78652;  Sun, 9 Mar 2003 13:37:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Vlagra and much more. Please look 8227Icsq-8 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 06:25:25 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;  boundary="----=_NextPart_6BE_5EFC_49261BD4.044A6FB1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-TMDA-Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------=_NextPart_6BE_5EFC_49261BD4.044A6FB1 Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ------=_NextPart_6BE_5EFC_49261BD4.044A6FB1 Content-Type: text/html;  charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQoNCjxoZWFkPg0KPG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29udGVudC1U eXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9d2luZG93cy0xMjUy Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdFTkVSQVRPUiIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0 IEZyb250UGFnZSA0LjAiPg0KPG1ldGEgbmFtZT0iUHJvZ0lkIiBjb250ZW50 PSJGcm9udFBhZ2UuRWRpdG9yLkRvY3VtZW50Ij4NCjx0aXRsZT5OZXcgUGFn ZSAxPC90aXRsZT4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCg0KPGJvZHk+DQoNCjxkaXYgYWxpZ249 ImNlbnRlciI+DQogIDxiaWc+PGI+VmlhIGdyYa48L2I+PC9iaWc+PGJyPg0K ICA8Yj5QcmVzY3JpcHRpb25zLU9ubGluZTwvYj48YnI+DQogIDxiPlNhZmUs IExlZ2FsLCBDb25maWRlbnRpYWwsIEd1YXJhbnRlZWQuLi48L2I+PGJyPg0K ICAgIDxiPkZyb20gb3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgdG8geW91ciBtYWlsYm94Li4uPC9i Pjxicj4NCiAgPGI+Q29udmVuaWVudCAmYW1wOyBBZmZvcmRhYmxlPC9iPg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGFsaWduPSJjZW50ZXIiPg0KICAmbmJzcDsNCjwvZGl2 Pg0KPGRpdiBhbGlnbj0iY2VudGVyIj4NCiAgPGI+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDov L3Ryb3BpY2FscGlsbHMuY29tL21haW4yLnBocD9yeD0xOTA0MSI+Y2xpY2sg aGVyZSBmb3IgbW9yZQ0KICBpbmZvPC9hPjwvYj48YnI+DQogIDwhLS0gcndq cGRqbHh3ZHl3amNjamYgLS0+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgYWxpZ249ImNlbnRl ciI+DQogICZuYnNwOw0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGFsaWduPSJjZW50ZXIiPg0K ICA8Yj5XZSBhbHNvIGhhdmUgbWFueSBXRUlHSFQtTE9TUyBwcm9kdWN0cy48 L2I+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgYWxpZ249ImNlbnRlciI+DQogIDxiPlJFTUVN QkVSIFNVTU1FUiBJUyBDT01JTkchPC9iPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGFsaWdu PSJjZW50ZXIiPg0KICAmbmJzcDsNCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBhbGlnbj0iY2Vu dGVyIj4NCiAgPGI+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3Ryb3BpY2FscGlsbHMuY29t L21haW4yLnBocD9yeD0xOTA0MSI+Y2xpY2sgaGVyZSBmb3IgbW9yZQ0KICBp bmZvPC9hPjwvYj48YnI+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXYgYWxpZ249ImNlbnRlciI+ DQogIDxiPlRha2UgYSBtb21lbnQgYW5kIHNlZSB3aGF0IHdlIGhhdmUuPC9i Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2IGFsaWduPSJjZW50ZXIiPg0KICAmbmJzcDsNCjwv ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBhbGlnbj0iY2VudGVyIj4NCiAgPGI+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0 cDovL3Ryb3BpY2FscGlsbHMuY29tL21haW4yLnBocD9yeD0xOTA0MSI+Y2xp Y2sgaGVyZTwvYT48L2I+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGFsaWduPSJjZW50ZXIiPiZu YnNwOzwvcD4NCg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0KDQo8L2h0bWw+DQoyNTcyYUdCZDItNTUz YUhwaDQxMTF5ZWlnNi00NTlweFRtMzYyN1VEZWI1LTY1OWNSakM1NzYzalNh QzQtNTIwVUl5djQ1NDRGSWVuNy03MzlCc2w3OA== ------=_NextPart_6BE_5EFC_49261BD4.044A6FB1-- This message does not get rejected.  Am I missing something? Thanks --RH -- But then again I thought VCR+ was a stupid idea and would die a quick death--so what do I know?