On Sunday 09 March 2003 21:29, Ron Bickers wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of Johnny Quazar > > > > Why use SpamAssassin if one is protected by TMDA? Just for those > > unprotected keyword addresses? Any other good reason? > > I use SA to determine whether or not I should bother with a TMDA > confirmation request or just dump the message altogether. If SA determines > a high SA index, I just trash the message. With as much SPAM as I get, > this gives a much needed reduction in my daily pending summary; a handful > vs. many dozens.
Actually, I enjoy watching how spamassassin determines if a message is spam, or not. That said, TMDA caught a Nigerian 419 variant that SA didn't. We've been using TMDA since 0.3x. In addition to blocking spam, we use it company-wide to easily authenticate the mail we send between offices. -- Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? ========================================================================== Robin Lynn Frank - Director of Operations - Paradigm-Omega, LLC Copyright and PGP/GPG info in mail or message headers. Email acceptance policy at http://paradigm-omega.com/email_policy.html ========================================================================== _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
