Patrick Starrenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I want to ensure *full* functionality of tmda for users outgoing
> mail which should I use? What would you both recommend / like to
> see.
tmda-inject per my previous message, unless there is a particular
reason you need compatibility with sendmail command-line options.
> The router and transport are below - the transport should work as
> written, for the flag checked in the router to show whether
> tmda-inject/sendmail has already processed the email what would you
> recommend/prefer I use. I was thinking the X-Delivery-Agent header?
X-Delivery-Agent will work unless the user is purposely choosing that
it not be included in her TMDA setup. Another option is looking at
the Received header that tmda-inject adds. e.g,
Received: by hrothgar.la.mastaler.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 501);
Tue, 27 May 2003 22:22:57 -0600 (MDT)
Even though it says ``tmda-sendmail'', tmda-inject is really what is
adding it.
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
