On Wed, 28 May 2003, Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
> Rept: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's what TMDA is choosing, not the actual envelope recipient. Again, I
refer you to the mail headers:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from wine.codeweavers.com (wine.codeweavers.com
[198.144.4.3])
by gateway.codegnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F512131F0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 26 May 2003 21:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Received: from wine.codeweavers.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by wine.codeweavers.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4R4c01v017313
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 26 May 2003 23:38:00 -0500
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 23:38:00 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Nospam is an alias for tjacobs. So, somewhere between procmail and tmda
on a postfix system, tmda gets confuzzled about the envelope recipient.
--
The DMCA is anti-consumer. The RIAA has no right to rewrite copyright
laws to suit themselves.
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
