On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 06:12:26PM +0800, Concordio M. Pajayat, Jr. wrote: > IOError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
Not related to Concordio's bug report, but I have been getting this same traceback error alot lately. I have a pipe filter rule that sends the message to spamc, and depending on the output of spamc it will challenge the message or not. The problem is being caused by spamc, which is crashing from some strange reason on messages that appear normal. Fortunately I monitor the queue enough to catch these things, and can temporarily comment out the rule, flush the queue, and the messages will be delivered. I am wondering if it would be a good idea to catch this exception and pass the message through instead. I realize that in my case the bug is in spamc, but just as Condordio was having the same problem, it might be better to always allow the message through, just to be safe. Does this make sense? Cory -- Cory Wright Stand Blue Technology http://www.standblue.net/ _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
