Cory Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am wondering if it would be a good idea to catch this exception > and pass the message through instead. I realize that in my case the > bug is in spamc, but just as Condordio was having the same problem, > it might be better to always allow the message through, just to be > safe.
This sort of runs counter to TMDA's general conservative philosophy of "defer" rather than "deliver" in the event of a problem or misconfiguration. Some users may prefer to defer the message until they can fix their script rather than having it passed through. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
