On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:11:18AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > If I can't change minds, I'd like to at least make clear that anyone > proceeding with a pure C-R spam response solution is not acting out of > ignorance. > > In this case, direct retaliation against the resulting spam is entirely > appropriate.
"direct retaliation"? that's nice.
how to bring peace to your inbox in three easy steps:
1. open the file ~/.tmda/filters/incoming in your favourite editor.
if you feel a need for a challenge, open it in an editor you hate.
2. add this line to it:
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] drop
3. save the file.
ah, more peace then a world without religious fundamentalism.
kevin
ps rick, i think karsten needs a good long session in a pub. take him
out and get him good and drunk. next time you're in dublin/galway
i'll pay you back. and maybe, you know, recommend a hobby or
something - like outside of email? please?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] i wouldn't mind what that says;
http://ie.suberic.net/~kevin/cgi-bin/blog paper never refused ink.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
