> If > you insist on using html though, it would seem to me that the burden > should > be on you to explain what that actually adds to your e-mail? Does it > add > anything to the message, or help convey it any better? If you are > simply > trying to ask a question, it would seem to me that text would be > sufficient > enough for such a task, AND you would reach the greatest number of > people in > your audience by using a format all could read. Simple courtesy. Is > that > really so hard to comprehend?
Isn't all of this a problem only if the sender uses HTML *only*? If the sender uses multipart/mixed messages containing both HTML and plain text, can't one least expect that in 2003 most people would be using email readers that can display the email in a readable format? - wolf - _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
