Lloyd Zusman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> In an earlier message here, Jason recommended that I do not do this: >>> >>> SENDER="<>" >> >> I don't think so. Please recheck our correspondence.
I apologize, I missed your ``do not''. I have a high fever so am not thinking very clearly at the moment. > Aside from the complications involved in refactoring working code, > are there any other reasons why a future version of TMDA couldn't > have this test performed right before a message is going to be sent > to the original sender? Let's see what the maildrop maintainer has to say about fixing the bug before we talk about changing working TMDA code. Can you pursue this with him? _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
