"Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lloyd Zusman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Sam doesn't have the most ... shall we say, cooperative attitude.
>
> Yeah, I know, and that's unfortunate.
>
>> If there's no one besides him working on maildrop, then it's going
>> to be painful to try get this change implemented.
>
> Might it be easier if someone else (you) writes the patch instead of
> just making a request? Hans Fuchs has one you could use for
> reference.
I'd be happy to look at the patch of Hans Fuchs.
Also ... I already am writing a patch to add some simple file-related
tests to maildrop: isfile(), exists(), etc. I could easily also slip in
an isset() function that takes the name of an environment variable and
returns 1 or 0 depending on whether the variable is set. Then, without
any loss of backward compatibilty, the following logic could be used in
maildrop recipes.
!isset("SENDER") variable not set
isset("SENDER") && "$SENDER" == "" variable set to empty string
"$SENDER" == "" either not set or empty string
... etc. ...
I agree that it's better to just do it than to try to get a
request approved. I believe in the adage, "It's easier to get
forgiveness than permission".
--
Lloyd Zusman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
