[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have an address I use > for external mail "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", since this is the one I want > people to keep in address books. In particular this is the one I want > in the From header Gmane postings, since that is what I subscribe to > mailing lists under. On the other hand, for dated addresses, I have > to send directly to the machine on my desk. > > So I want > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > for mail going through tmda's outgoing filter this can > be accomplished by using [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the From header, and > using > tag from [EMAIL PROTECTED] reply-to dated=2w > > in an outgoing filter file. > > > For mail CC'd from Gmane postings, this does not work, since I need > the From header of the Gmane posting to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't understand this. Are you referring to messages that you post to Gmane (through a news-reader) and simultaneously CC to someone else? tmda-sendmail (and thus your outgoing filter) don't come into play with news postings using NNTP. Or are you posting to Gmane through a mail gateway? If so, you could use two different rules, one matching the mail gateway and the other being the default, the last rule in the outgoing filter. tmda-sendmail looks up each CC'd and BCC'd address separately in the filter and modifies a separate copy of the message accordingly. > It would be very convenient in this situation if there was a way to > specify address templates in the outgoing filter, or failing that in a > configuration variable. Right now what I do is add a dated reply to > header in the mail user agent (as discussed elsewhere in the archives > and maybe the FAQ: look for gnus) , and turn off tmda outgoing > processing using an "X-TMDA: bare" header. > > Phew. That was a bit long. I had two points (other than to make > excuses for until recently sending out broken dated addresses). One is > to document my workaround, and the other is to express support to an > enhancement to the outgoing filter format. Perhaps the latter is > better discussed on tmda-workers? Yup, but I've tagged this message just to be sure to keep it around for some thought. Tim _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
