On 01/01/2004 6:51 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > So > if you tell me how to contact those Mailman folks, I am willing to > discuss the matter with them.
http://www.list.org/ I can't believe you haven't heard of it. Take a look at "Mailman in Use" for a few that have. > Using a null envelope sender address > on a given message actually provides LESS information to the person, and > to the MTA, and to the spam filter that will receive the message. Then don't do it. Set BOUNCE_ENV_SENDER as you wish. > You, and other people like you who are also misusing the null envelope > sender address construct are actively hampering spam filtering efforts, > and making them harder. Can you be more specific? What exactly is lacking an envelope sender address preventing a spam filter from doing that needs to be done? > You are following one bonehead's screwy idea of what is correct, and that > bonehead hasn't even provided any logical basis for his beliefs. If TMDA were changed as you demand, you would be that bonehead. You've provided nothing more than insults and rantings of your own unfounded opinions, and what could be a meaningful discussion on the merits of your complaints will be ignored by many as the rude and inconsiderate blather that it has become. -- Ron _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
