Cory Wright wrote: > On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 03:51:19PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >> One-shot single recipient messages are NOT bulk. Period. End of story. > > > Are ``One-shot single recipient messages" to be considered ``junk" then? > > It seems to me that if the Precedence header is to be taken seriously then > it can not be set to ``junk" either.
The mistake is to think that protocol terms mean what they say, rather than define something by their resulting actions. In DNS the term CNAME is short for canonical name, but later RFC's make it clear that a system may have 'more than one canonical name'. I'll leave it to the reader to visit 'dictionary.com' and decide if you should have more than one canonical name. Contrast also the famous astronaut rhetorical(?) question 'I have to click on the 'Start' button to shut it down?'. Apologies for prolonging an already excessive thread.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
