Drew Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My main problem with TMDA is the incoherence between the MUA and > tmda-sendmail.
Although this incoherence has the advantage of being MUA-independent. As opposed to doing the tagging in the MUA. > When you compose a message in most any mail client, you see exactly > what the recipient will see. Once it's passed on to TMDA, there's > no looking back. True. However, why does this matter? > Granted, the original thread topic wouldn't do much to keep me from > shooting myself in the foot, but having the header there at least > causes me to think, ``Gee, do I want TMDA's default behavior here, > or do I want to tag this message a special way? This seems limiting, particularly when composing a message to multiple recipients, each of which will probably receive a different tagging. > And I don't remember if this person is whitelisted; I better > check to make sure so they don't get a dated address that they > might respond to after it expires...'' Let TMDA do this work for you. Once you have your outgoing filter setup correctly, TMDA will just "do the right thing" when you send the message. > When I see a From: header in my message, I think ``Is that the right > From: header?'' I'd like the same kind of mind-jogging with TMDA's > behavior. I still fail to see why you need to know how the message will be tagged before you send it. As I said, your outgoing filter will make sure each recipient gets the correct tagging, and you won't have to think about this. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
