Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > > Drew Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Not for me, because I would have an X-TMDA: on every > > message. > > Which you still haven't told us why you need/want to do <wink>.
I explained why. Since I'm using it so much anyway, I'm going to insert it on every message. I can then habitually check its contents before sending. > > The fact that it's dated is inferable, but it'd be nice to > > know which timeout was specified (it would be known if the > > *exact* line was written). > > I'm simply not understanding what you are asking for. > > Could you perhaps provide a hypothetical "Actn:" line? Actn: X-TMDA: dated=8d (2342) _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
