Drew Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If ``default'' is used with X-TMDA, then the outgoing filter > isn't parsed apparently.
Actually, if X-TMDA is used at all, the outgoing filter is ignored. It's a complete override. Perhaps we should do that differently when 'default' is used on the X-TMDA field (check the filter first then use ACTION_OUTGOING). The default action, I suspect, is rarely used and we might not have the right behavior worked out yet. In fact, you may be the first person to try it (beyond my initial testing). > I doesn't matter though. I'm taking Jason's advice to simply > clean up my outgoing rules. I have developed a system much like he described. I don't use sender addresses and only rarely keyword addresses (for announce-type lists that I want to allow through with a minimum of hassle). All lists and unwhitelisted destinations get dated addresses; all whitelisted addresses get a bare From:. That's it. It's really simple. Once you decide to add a correspondent to your whitelist, they automatically switch to bare from dated. No fuss. Tim _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
