Gre7g Luterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we had a compare function like that, then the user could > configure how close the X-Preferred-Address would have to be to the > reply-to address before we would use it. Otherwise we'd simply use > the reply- to address.
I think this is a pretty good heuristic to limit potential abuse. We should choose a good default value though, as most users probably won't bother changing it. I'd vote for #4 in your example: To be considered matching, the last two parts of address domains must match. i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] would match. I think this is flexible enough to cover most users while still greatly limiting potential abuse. Apropos, TMDA currently replies to the envelope sender address (i.e, Return-Path), not Reply-To, but perhaps that's what you meant. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
