On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:59:21PM -0700, Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
>I guess I'm not clear on what the patch would do? Or, put another way,
>how you would attempt to solve this using TMDA?
I'd make it so that I could do this in outgoing:
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag to dated=600s from bare
Thus whenever I sent myself email, it'd always be to an address that
required access to my crypt_key. And I wouldn't need to add myself
to my whitelist. And yes, it makes TMDA into an aliasing service.
The difference is that TMDA's aliasing service requires access to my
crypt_key to work.
Cheers,
- Mark
_________________________________________________
tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
