Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > "Jesse D. Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> I won't add a hack though, even if it's optional, because it >>> could lead to users inadvertently losing mail. >> >> Good. I don't write hacks. I only write professional code. > > I wasn't referring to the quality of the code, but rather the > implementation. > > An example "hack" would be trying to differentiate between bounces and > auto-responses by searching the message body and/or headers for > particular identifying keywords or content.
Well, we'll see. I may not have a choice in that area, but I can guarantee that it'll be as error-proof as possible. If that's not good enough... well, we'll just have to see I suppose. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net We are actively looking for companies that do a lot of long distance faxing and want to cut their long distance bill by up to 50%. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
