On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:48:22 -0600, "Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How is this related? Because I suspect that something has changed regarding how tofmipd forks, which is something that could be looked into when messing with PID's. They seem very closely related. > UPGRADE says: > > * tmda-ofmipd now forks into the background by default. Use the > ``--foreground'' option to retain the old behavior. > > So, if it doesn't work with svscan now (with -f), it didn't before, > right? You would think so, but I had 0.59's tofmipd working fine under svscan, but 0.79's tofmipd won't (for me), even with the -f flag. > See the -users archives for discussion on svscan and tmda-ofmipd. > Andrew St. Jean has a HOWTO which shows how he made it work. That > said, there is no consensus on how to make it work. It works > perfectly for some, and others can't make it work at all (even > following the same instructions, etc.). > > Personally, I've *never* liked daemontools/svscan. I always found it > non-intuitive, and difficult to setup/configure, with unpredictable > behavior. I avoid it whenever I can. YMMV. Personally, I like svscan, but I do not know what is upsetting it in tofmipd. If I get a chance, I'll play with it more. FWIW, fghack did not fix it. Gre7g. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
