Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Besides, what if the file was 100M, or 200M?
TMDA can't save you from poor system administration practices. Your server shouldn't allow mail messages even close to that large. > I'm fairly confident that the same goals of reliability and speed > can be accomplished without the extra RAM usage, and if that's the > case, why shouldn't I pursue it? I'm not saying you shouldn't pursue it, just that I'm not going to pursue this myself. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
