Mark Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'd much rather see tmda-check-address extended. Perhaps '-M' should >> even be moved there from tmda-filter. Can you dig it? > > Yes, I think so. But I also think adding this to tmda-check-address > is going to be more work than adding it to tmda-filter. I basically > need to recreate tmda-filter in tmda-check-address so that the latter > can handle all of the same contingencies that the former handles. > > What would help me is if I moved some of the functions in > tmda-rfilter into a module. Can I try tackling that, too or is > that a bigger problem than it seems?
Moving code from tmda-rfilter into a module is on the todo list[1] anyway, so I'd say definitely, yes. Footnotes: [1] Section 1, http://wiki.tmda.net/TmdaOneDotTwoTodoList _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([email protected]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
