If you can find a more reliable method then let me know :-).
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 06:16:31PM +1200, Tom Ryder wrote: > Hi Nicholas; > > I can confirm the override line you suggested seems to work nicely with r2860, > thanks. I'll make that part of my configuration [1] and will forward this to > the VTE devs shortly. > > I wonder if there could be some more reliable means of testing whether the > terminal supported the DECCRA operation than testing the xterm version > number. > > Thanks! > > --Tom@Sanctum > > [1] > https://github.com/tejr/dotfiles/commit/54bee6bccfeee654192243617cdc295cfa849e99 > > On 19 August 2012 17:55, Nicholas Marriott <nicholas.marri...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi > > > > It is pretty silly of them to use something identical to xterm. They > > could have changed one of the other parameters. It might be worth > > mentioning it to them. > > > > The easiest way to turn it off is to stop TERM telling tmux this is an > > xterm with something like: > > > > set -ga terminal-overrides ',*:XT@' > > > > We should probably put a range check in since xterm won't get to version > > 2802 for a few years. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:11:55AM +1200, Tom Ryder wrote: > >> Hi tmux devs; > >> > >> Revision r2749 (sync OpenBSD patchset 1070) by tcunha includes some code > >> implementing SCL 5 mode and DECCRA transformations for xterms that report > >> versions over 270. This is working as expected in my xterm version 278. The > >> code determines the xterm version by reading it from the control sequence > >> [>1;278;0c. > >> > >> However, VTE (the GTK terminal widget on which xfce4-terminal and > >> gnome-terminal among others are based) does not seem to follow this > >> behavior, > >> instead substituting a transformation of its own major and minor version > >> number > >> in the function vte_sequence_handler_send_secondary_device_attributes(): > >> > >> <http://gitorious.org/community-ssu/vte/blobs/master/src/vteseq.c#line3040> > >> > >> The most recent version of this library as packaged for Debian Sid, by way > >> of > >> example, returns the version number 2802; from tmux-server.log with tmux > >> -vvvvv > >> and xfce4-terminal: > >> > >> keys are 12 (^[[>1;2802;0c) > >> received xterm version 2802 > >> > >> However, despite thereby passing the >270 version comparison test, VTE > >> does not > >> seem to implement the DECCRA codes that tmux expects as of this revision, > >> and as a result its behaviour when redrawing smaller rectangles on the > >> screen is > >> wrong, failing to redraw the appropriate sections correctly and/or > >> spitting DECCRA > >> control codes into the terminal. > >> > >> One way to reproduce this is to open a vertical split in a new tmux > >> session in > >> xfce4-terminal, and in the leftmost pane to cut lines from a vim buffer > >> about > >> 3 or 4 lines above the bottom of the pane. This works as expected in an > >> xterm > >> but fails in VTE based terminals and appears to happen independently of > >> $TERM > >> settings. > >> > >> An easy temporary fix (and what I'm doing from this point) is to rewrite > >> all > >> the version tests in revision r2749 to fail, after which everything > >> works properly > >> again in all terminals I've tried. > >> > >> Is this perhaps something that should be taken up with the VTE devs, or > >> could > >> there be some other sensible workaround? This is my first submission to the > >> list, so apologies if I've not followed an appropriate procedure. I'm > >> a big fan of > >> tmux and I love the work you guys do. > >> > >> -- Tom Ryder @ Sanctum > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Live Security Virtual Conference > >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> tmux-users mailing list > >> tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
