Hi Nicholas, Am 07.05.2013 um 15:03 schrieb Nicholas Marriott: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:17:23PM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Am 25.04.2013 um 23:57 schrieb Nicholas Marriott >> <nicholas.marri...@gmail.com>: >>> The relevant license/copyright is at the top of every source file, I >>> don't think we need it in another place. Note that it differs for some >>> files in compat/ and examples/. >> >> I see. OpenCSW has the policy to include the license files for the >> respective software >> in the package, so the status quo means I need to parse all headers and make >> a >> unified license which seems unnecessary awkward. >> >>> IIRC Debian have a full list of all the licenses in some file in their >>> package. >> >> This sounds like a good solution. Would you accept a patch with the >> respective >> LICENSE.* files to be included in the tarball as modeled in Debian? It would >> make the life of downstream packagers easier and is pretty common to do so, > > Sure I think this would be ok.
I imported the license summary in Debian-style: https://sourceforge.net/p/tmux/tmux-code/merge-requests/4/ Is this ok or do you have suggestions for modification? Best regards -- Dago ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
