I think we just need the licenses not every copyright and lists of files which is a pain to keep up to date.
In fact I wonder if just a line or two at the end of the README would be enough. On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Am 07.05.2013 um 17:32 schrieb Thomas Adam: > > On 7 May 2013 16:24, Dagobert Michelsen <d...@opencsw.org> wrote: > >> I imported the license summary in Debian-style: > >> https://sourceforge.net/p/tmux/tmux-code/merge-requests/4/ > >> > >> Is this ok or do you have suggestions for modification? > > > > Looks OK, but what's the reason behind having a File: section? It > > seems incomplete with respect to most other authors, as well as > > annoying to maintain when the license clearly states who the copyright > > author(s) are, and where in the file(s) such information is found. > > This is basically the license information from Debian which Nicholas > considered acceptable. > I broader license information with just the top part and "see the files for > details" > would be ok for me too. The important part for me is that there is a file > explaining > the copyright situation of tmux in a dedicated place. > > > Best regards > > -- Dago ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
