Hi Thomas, I thought my patch would be committed using "git am" (in which case, the lengthy description I wrote would become the commit log and my name would appear in the author field) but it wasn't.
As a result, I couldn't find my patch in the "git log" output. And so I asked here. :-) Thanks for your consideration. On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Thomas Adam <tho...@xteddy.org> wrote: > On 7 February 2014 20:16, Suraj Kurapati <sun...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Nicholas, >> >> The discussion in ticket #97 http://sourceforge.net/p/tmux/tickets/97/ >> seems to validate my patch. >> >> That makes me wonder... has it already been accepted into the tmux codebase? >> >> If so, could you please tell me the commit SHA so I can verify? > > I'm not sure why you couldn't have checked yourself: > > commit c930fd5ff696f5a60e93ed503f0ff57e0bbf6e4d > Author: nicm <nicm> > Date: Tue Jan 28 22:19:17 2014 +0000 > > Remember the last active pane in the top-bottom or left-right cell so > that it can be restored when moving back to that cell with selectp > -L/-R/etc. From Suraj N Kurapati. > > > -- Thomas Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
